Choose your specialty from the list below to see how our experts have tackled a wide range of client questions.
Looking for something specific? Utilize our search feature by typing in a key word!
Is Scar Revision Still Complex Closure?
I have a scar revision for the abdomen and was going to assign CPT 13101. My coding teammate told me this is no longer the current coding recommendation. Is scar revision still reported with complex closure?
Question:
I have a scar revision for the abdomen and was going to assign CPT 13101. My coding teammate told me this is no longer the current coding recommendation. Is scar revision still reported with complex closure?
Answer:
Thank you for your inquiry!
Yes, your fellow coder is correct. At one point, CPT did include scar revision within the complex closure guidelines. However, in 2020, the guidelines associated with closures were changed, and scar revision was removed from the complex closure definition.
To address this change, a coding tip was placed within the CPT book in 2020 stating: “To report scar revision, see the Skin, Subcutaneous, and Accessory Structures, Excision-Benign Lesion subsection codes (11400-11471).”
According to CPT guidelines, scar revision is no longer reported with complex wound closure. Coding recommendations and guidelines are subject to change, so coders must review them and utilize up-to-date coding resources.
*This response is based on the best information available as of 1/30/25.
Number and Complexity of Problems Addressed
I see a number of patients with chronic problems such as dermatitis, psoriasis, history of skin cancer and acne to name a few. What defines stable versus exacerbation or progression?
Question:
I see a number of patients with chronic problems such as dermatitis, psoriasis, history of skin cancer and acne to name a few. What defines stable versus exacerbation or progression?
Answer:
Based on the AMA CPT guidelines a chronic illness is expected to last at least a year or until the death of the patient. You as the practitioner determines when a condition becomes chronic. Of course, there are many conditions that are chronic by the nature of the disease. A stable chronic illness is defined by the specific treatment goals of each individual patient. A patient who is not at treatment goal, not responding to treatment, condition failing to improve, etc. is not stable.
If the patient has a chronic illness with exacerbation, progression or side effect of treatment or inadequately controlled, this would be considered a chronic illness with exacerbation or progression. Typically, a condition exacerbating will require a change or modification in the plan of care. It is important for each problem addressed the practitioner documents the complexity of the problem (stable, chronic, acute, uncomplicated) and the status of the condition (at treatment goal, inadequately controlled, worsening, improving) to paint a clear picture of the condition.
*This response is based on the best information available as of 1/16/25.
History and Examination requirement for E/M services
I have been practicing for many years and am confused about the E/M guidelines since the changes were made a few years ago, mainly for my office services 99202-99215. My coder says I should document an history and examination, but I don’t think this is required anymore. Am I correct?
Question:
I have been practicing for many years and am confused about the E/M guidelines since the changes were made a few years ago, mainly for my office services 99202-99215. My coder says I should document an history and examination, but I don’t think this is required anymore. Am I correct?
Answer:
The evaluation and management service levels are no longer determined by history and examination but are based on medical-decision making or Time except for emergency department visit codes (99281-99285), which do not contain a time component. However, a clinically relevant history and examination are required based on the practitioner’s clinical judgment. It is essential to tell the “story” of the patient’s clinical picture in the documentation. The history and examination support the medical necessity for the visit and provide a more complete representation of the patient’s condition for continuity and coordination of care with other clinical practitioners.
*This response is based on the best information available as of 1/2/25.
Which Modifier Should I Use?
I need some help with using Modifiers. I work for a Mohs surgeon, and he frequently performs Mohs, and the patient comes back differently for a flap or graft. They usually come back within a week. What modifier should I add to the repair when the patient returns?
Question:
I need some help with using Modifiers. I work for a Mohs surgeon, and he frequently performs Mohs, and the patient comes back differently for a flap or graft. They usually come back within a week. What modifier should I add to the repair when the patient returns?
Answer:
Mohs Micrographic surgery has a global period of “0” days. That means if the patient comes back for the repair on a different date, no modifier is required.
*This response is based on the best information available as of 12/19/24.
Billing an E/M Service after Mohs when a repair is indicated
Our Mohs surgeons sometimes perform an adjacent tissue transfer or a flap after Mohs surgery. Since they decided to do the flap after Mohs, they want to bill an E/M service with Modifier 57. I don’t think this is correct. Can you help clarify?
Question:
Our Mohs surgeons sometimes perform an adjacent tissue transfer or a flap after Mohs surgery. Since they decided to do the flap after Mohs, they want to bill an E/M service with Modifier 57. I don’t think this is correct. Can you help clarify?
Answer:
The E/M service should not be reported after Mohs surgery when a decision is made for a repair, flap, or graft. Even though a flap has a 90-day global period, the surgical decision was made to perform Mohs, the primary procedure. The intent of the E/M with Modifier 57 for a procedure with a 90 global period is when the initial decision is made to perform the primary procedure. The repair is secondary; therefore, billing an E/M service is inappropriate. The discussion and recommendation for the repair is part of the pre-service work for the repair and the E/M service is inherent to the procedure.
CMS Global Surgery Workbook says: “When the decision to perform the minor procedure comes immediately before a major procedure or service, we consider it a routine pre-operative service and you can’t bill a visit or consultation with the procedure. MACs may not pay for an E/M service billed with CPT modifier –57 if it’s provided on the day of, or the day before, a procedure with a 000- or 010-day global surgical period. “
Source: https://www.cms.gov/files/document/mln907166-global-surgery-booklet.pdf
*This response is based on the best information available as of 12/5/24.
Adjacent Tissue Transfer
We are having some controversy in the office. Many of our physicians state the sq cm size of the primary and secondary defect combined is enough to support an Adjacent Tissue Transfer. Can you help?
Question:
We are having some controversy in the office. Many of our physicians state the sq cm size of the primary and secondary defect combined is enough to support an Adjacent Tissue Transfer. Can you help?
Answer:
To properly code for an Adjacent Tissue Transfer (ATT), you must document the site of the ATT, the size of the primary defect, the size of the secondary defect, and the total square centimeter size (add the size of the primary defect, the secondary defect and report the total size
*This response is based on the best information available as of 10/3/24.