Choose your specialty from the list below to see how our experts have tackled a wide range of client questions.

Looking for something specific? Utilize our search feature by typing in a key word!

Neurosurgery William Via Neurosurgery William Via

Coding 61750 vs. 61751 for a Stereotactic Biopsy

We struggle with the code description for CPT 61750 vs 61751. Our providers load MRI and/or CT scans to a stereotactic navigation machine during surgery for Stereotactic biopsy, aspiration, or excision of a tumor. Which code would be correct when an MRI scan is used during surgery? The scan was done prior to going to the OR.

Question:

We struggle with the code description for CPT 61750 vs 61751. Our providers load MRI and/or CT scans to a stereotactic navigation machine during surgery for Stereotactic biopsy, aspiration, or excision of a tumor. Which code would be correct when an MRI scan is used during surgery? The scan was done prior to going to the OR.

Answer:

Code 61751 is reported regardless of when the CT was performed, and it is typically performed before the patient goes to the OR.

*This response is based on the best information available as of 02/07/26.

 
 
 
Read More
Dermatology William Via Dermatology William Via

Coding a Flap after Mohs Surgery

A patient was seen by a dermatologist in their clinic for a MOHS procedure. After completion of MOHS, the patient went to the ambulatory surgical center for our ENT provider to perform CPT 14060. Since the ENT did not perform the MOHS excision but did perform the flap, would a 52 modifier have been appropriate since the opening excision was performed by a different specialty at a different location?

Question:

A patient was seen by a dermatologist in their clinic for a MOHS procedure. After completion of MOHS, the patient went to the ambulatory surgical center for our ENT provider to perform CPT 14060. Since the ENT did not perform the MOHS excision but did perform the flap, would a 52 modifier have been appropriate since the opening excision was performed by a different specialty at a different location?

Answer:

Thank you for your question. Modifier 52 (Reduced Services) is only used when the same provider performs a service but reduces or does not complete the full work of the CPT code.

In this case your ENT did perform the full flap procedure described by CPT 14060. The fact that a different specialty performed the Mohs excision beforehand does not mean your ENT performed a reduced service. The ENT was not expected to perform the excision because the Mohs surgeon already did it. The flap reconstruction can be billed by ENT without a modifier.

*This response is based on the best information available as of 02/05/26.

 
 
 
Read More
Interventional Pain William Via Interventional Pain William Via

CMC Joint Injections

My hospital coder recently told me that I should not bill CMC injections as 20605 but rather 20600. I remember during the conference that 20605 is a justifiable code for thumb CMC joint injections. Can you verify that this is correct and offer me some guidance on what to present to the hospital coder?  

Question:

My hospital coder recently told me that I should not bill CMC injections as 20605 but rather 20600. I remember during the conference that 20605 is a justifiable code for thumb CMC joint injections. Can you verify that this is correct and offer me some guidance on what to present to the hospital coder?  

Answer:

Thank you for your question. The current guidance, based on an AMA CPT Assistant from August of 2017, is an injection into the CMC joint is 20600.  

*This response is based on the best information available as of 02/05/26.

 
 
 
Read More
Plastic Surgery William Via Plastic Surgery William Via

Denial - 19371

We received a denial for 19371 when billed with 19342 for an implant exchange to a smaller implant. Is the denial correct?

Question:

We received a denial for 19371 when billed with 19342 for an implant exchange to a smaller implant. Is the denial correct?

Answer:

This is a great question and a common scenario.

While coding guidance indicates that code 19371 may be reported in addition to code 19342, this is considered correct coding under CPT rules.

However, Medicare’s National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) bundles 19371 into 19342. Additionally, modifier 59 should not be appended to 19371 to bypass the NCCI edit when both procedures are performed on the same breast. The denial is correct when billing Medicare or payers that follow NCCI edits.

Thank you for reaching out to KZA with your inquiry!

*This response is based on the best information available as of 02/05/26.

 
 
 
Read More
Otolaryngology (ENT) William Via Otolaryngology (ENT) William Via

Reporting Rhinoplasty with Septal Repair

Our physician frequently performs septorhinoplasty procedures to address severe septal deviation and, in some cases, nasal valve collapse. He typically bills CPT 30420, which includes major septal repair. However, we are seeking clarification due to conflicting references: the Coders’ Desk Reference describes 30420 as involving nasal bone fracture and repositioning, and other sources suggest it is primarily a cosmetic procedure. Given that our physician’s intent is functional—improving airway obstruction—does CPT 30420 still apply? Is reshaping of the nasal tip or dorsal hump required to justify 30420, or would CPT 30520 (septoplasty) be more appropriate in these cases?

Question:

Our physician frequently performs septorhinoplasty procedures to address severe septal deviation and, in some cases, nasal valve collapse. He typically bills CPT 30420, which includes major septal repair. However, we are seeking clarification due to conflicting references: the Coders’ Desk Reference describes 30420 as involving nasal bone fracture and repositioning, and other sources suggest it is primarily a cosmetic procedure. Given that our physician’s intent is functional, improving airway obstruction, does CPT 30420 still apply? Is reshaping of the nasal tip or dorsal hump required to justify 30420, or would CPT 30520 (septoplasty) be more appropriate in these cases?

Answer:

The Coders’ Desk Reference includes an introductory disclaimer stating that each procedural description represents one possible method of performing the service and should not be interpreted as the only acceptable approach. Its narrative examples are intended to illustrate common surgical techniques, not to define the required components of the CPT code itself. If both a rhinoplasty and septoplasty are performed, report 30420 to capture the combined procedure, as this code includes major septal repair. Ensure that the appropriate functional or reconstructive diagnosis is reported on the claim to support medical necessity.

*This response is based on the best information available as of 02/05/26.

 
 
 
Read More
Orthopaedics William Via Orthopaedics William Via

Biceps Tenodesis or Tendon Transfer

The provider performs shoulder arthroplasties and also does a bicep muscle transfer to the pectoralis muscle. He bills 23472 for the arthroplasty and then wants to bill 23395 for the muscle transfer. The portion of his note for this procedure is: "I then traced the long head of the biceps brachii from the pectoralis major through the rotator interval and released the biceps from its origin. The biceps tendon was diseased from the groove to its insertion on the supraglenoid tubercle. I then sutured the tendon into the pectoralis major tendon as a muscle transfer." I am not in agreement that this procedure is representative of 23395 and think it should be 23430, which would bundle with the shoulder arthroplasty. Do you have any guidance on the correct use of 23395 and if it is the correct code in this situation? Thank you.


Question:

The provider performs shoulder arthroplasties and also does a bicep muscle transfer to the pectoralis muscle. He bills 23472 for the arthroplasty and then wants to bill 23395 for the muscle transfer. The portion of his note for this procedure is: "I then traced the long head of the biceps brachii from the pectoralis major through the rotator interval and released the biceps from its origin. The biceps tendon was diseased from the groove to its insertion on the supraglenoid tubercle. I then sutured the tendon into the pectoralis major tendon as a muscle transfer." I am not in agreement that this procedure is representative of 23395 and think it should be 23430, which would bundle with the shoulder arthroplasty. Do you have any guidance on the correct use of 23395 and if it is the correct code in this situation? Thank you.

Answer:

Thank you for your question. We have noticed providers trying to bill for 23472 and 23395 vs. 23472 and 23430.  Attaching the biceps tendon to the pectoralis major in the scenario you provided above should be coded to 23430. Reattaching the biceps, regardless of the location it is reattached, is considered a biceps tenodesis and should not be confused with a tendon transfer. 

There is an NCCI edit between 23472 and 23430 which needs to be followed for government payors. CPT Assistant July 2024 as well as the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' Global Service Data (GSD) both state the biceps tenodesis is not part of the shoulder arthroplasty. A separate diagnosis for the biceps pathology should be added and linked to CPT 23430.

*This response is based on the best information available as of 02/05/26.

 
 
 
Read More

Do you have a Coding Question you would like answered in a future Coding Coach?

If you have an urgent coding question, don't hesitate to get in touch with us here.