Choose your specialty from the list below to see how our experts have tackled a wide range of client questions.
Looking for something specific? Utilize our search feature by typing in a key word!
Lobectomy with Substernal Component
I have a coding question that I'm hoping you can help me out with. If a doctor removes only one lobe of the thyroid and also includes the substernal component, should 60271 or 60220-22 be used? Thank you!
Question:
I have a coding question that I'm hoping you can help me out with. If a doctor removes only one lobe of the thyroid and also includes the substernal component, should 60271 or 60220-22 be used? Thank you!
Answer:
Unless a sternal split is performed, report 60220 for a thyroid lobectomy. Code 60271 request splitting the sternum. If documentation supports significant additional work, modifier 22 may be append to 60220.
*This response is based on the best information available as of 12/04/25.
Removal of a Patellar Tendon Ossicle/Tibial Tubercle Ossicle
Is there another CPT code can be used for the removal of a patellar tendon ossicle/tibial tubercle ossicle or is an unlisted procedure code the only option? Any help you can provide will greatly appreciated!
Question:
Is there another CPT that code can be used for the removal of a patellar tendon ossicle/tibial tubercle ossicle or is an unlisted procedure code the only option? Any help you can provide will be greatly appreciated!
Answer:
Thanks for reaching out. Current CPT guidance for a patella tendon ossicle or tibial tubercle ossicle removal is unlisted CPT 27599.
*This response is based on the best information available as of 12/04/25.
Bone Marrow Aspirate
Good afternoon,
One of our physicians is performing an injection of bone marrow aspirate concentrate into infraspinatus, supraspinatus tendons and the glenohumeral joint, under ultrasound guidance. Bone marrow was aspirated from bilateral iliac crests under US guidance and processed via centrifugation. How should this be reported?
Thank you
Question:
Good afternoon,
One of our physicians is performing an injection of bone marrow aspirate concentrate into infraspinatus, supraspinatus tendons and the glenohumeral joint, under ultrasound guidance. Bone marrow was aspirated from bilateral iliac crests under US guidance and processed via centrifugation. How should this be reported?
Thank you
Answer:
CPT Category III code 0232T was introduced in 2010 for reporting injection of platelet rich plasma to a targeted site; the code definition includes all harvesting, preparation, and image guidance for the service. In August 2010 the AAOS published guidance in AAOS Now which explained “The new code is to be used only when PRP is performed in a complete separate patient encounter from a surgical procedure.”
Based on this direction, when PRP is injected during another procedure, whether using drawn blood or bone marrow aspirate, it is not separately reportable with the primary surgical service.
If PRP injection is the only service performed, then 0232T is the correct code. In recent years some physicians have begun using bone marrow aspirate harvested from the iliac crest instead of drawn blood for PRP preparation, and reporting the harvesting using CPT code 38220. The May 2012 edition of CPT Assistant clarified that 0232T is the only code reportable for PRP injection, whether performed using drawn blood or harvested bone marrow aspirate. In 2018 the definition of 38220 was changed to reflect that it should be used only for diagnostic bone marrow aspiration. New code 20939 should be used when bone marrow aspiration is performed for bone grafting, for spine surgery only, via a separate incision. CPT instructs to use 20999 for bone grafting, other than spine surgery and other therapeutic musculoskeletal applications.
*This response is based on the best information available as of 12/04/25.
Appropriate CPT Coding for OLLIF
I have a provider who wants to code 22558 for a procedure that is done posterior only. I am coding as TLIF, posterior interbody fusion with posterolateral fusion and Laminectomy, facetectomy, foraminotomy for decompression with discectomy. He states this is OLLIF not OLIF but still wants 22558. There is no repositioning of the patient. He does not enter the retroperitoneal space. All incisions are done posteriorly. Any guidance?
Question:
I have a provider who wants to code 22558 for a procedure that is done posterior only. I am coding as TLIF, posterior interbody fusion with posterolateral fusion and Laminectomy, facetectomy, foraminotomy for decompression with discectomy. He states this is OLLIF not OLIF but still wants 22558. There is no repositioning of the patient. He does not enter the retroperitoneal space. All incisions are done posteriorly. Any guidance?
Answer:
Neither CPT 22558 nor CPT 22633 is appropriate for reporting an OLLIF procedure.
CPT 22558 describes an anterior interbody fusion and requires an anterior or anterolateral approach, typically involving retroperitoneal or transabdominal access. Since OLLIF is performed via a posterior-only, percutaneous approach, it does not meet the criteria for this code.
CPT 22633 describes a posterior interbody fusion combined with posterolateral fusion, typically used for TLIF procedures. However, OLLIF is a distinct technique that does not involve the same surgical exposure or instrumentation as TLIF.
According to CPT Assistant, June 2020, Volume 30, Issue 6, page 14: There is no specific CPT code that accurately describes the OLLIF procedure. Therefore, unlisted code 22899, Unlisted procedure, spine, should be reported. When reporting an unlisted code to describe a procedure or service, it is necessary to submit supporting documentation (e.g., procedure report) with the claim to provide an adequate description of the nature, extent, and need for the procedure, as well as the time, effort, and equipment necessary to provide the service.
Using 22899 ensures accurate representation of the surgical technique and compliance with AMA coding guidance, helping avoid potential denials or audits.
*This response is based on the best information available as of 12/04/25.
Bundling of Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy and Turbinate Procedures
Can you explain why the sleep endoscopy 42975 and any turbinate procedure is bundled? The procedures are done for two completely different reasons—OSA and turbinate hypertrophy.
Question:
Can you explain why the sleep endoscopy 42975 and any turbinate procedure is bundled? The procedures are done for two completely different reasons—OSA and turbinate hypertrophy.
Answer:
Although CPT® 42975 and turbinate procedures (30801/30802) address distinct clinical conditions such as dynamic airway collapse in OSA versus nasal obstruction from turbinate hypertrophy, they are bundled under National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) edits due to shared anatomical access and procedural overlap.
Additionally, CMS coding policy states that when a diagnostic procedure leads directly to a therapeutic intervention during the same operative session, only the therapeutic procedure should be reported. The diagnostic service is considered part of the decision-making process and is not separately reimbursable.
According to CMS and NCCI guidelines, CPT® codes 30801 and 30802 cannot be separately reported when performed in the same session as other nasal or sinus procedures, including:
For access to the nose or sinuses
For control of intraoperative bleeding
When performed concurrently with other nasal procedures
Importantly, modifiers such as 59 or XU are not permitted to bypass this bundling, even if the procedures are performed for separate indications. It is important to remember that turbinate hypertrophy can contribute to sleep-disordered breathing, including OSA. The coding system treats these procedures as components of a single encounter when performed together, and separate reimbursement is not allowed.
*This response is based on the best information available as of 12/04/25.
Reporting 36015
We have seen some illustrations suggesting the maximum number for reporting 36015 in one session is 5 (3-right(U,M,L), 2 Left(U,L). This method only counts the lobar arteries and excludes counting the segmental arteries. Is it your opinion that each segmental artery can be individually reported? For example, if the provider performed selective catheterization on the right side of the medial basal segment, the posterior basal segment and the lateral basal segment would this count as three (3) total under the lower lobe or count as one (1) since all are in the lower lobe?
Question:
We have seen some illustrations suggesting the maximum number for reporting 36015 in one session is 5 (3-right(U,M,L), 2 Left(U,L). This method only counts the lobar arteries and excludes counting the segmental arteries. Is it your opinion that each segmental artery can be individually reported? For example, if the provider performed selective catheterization on the right side of the medial basal segment, the posterior basal segment and the lateral basal segment would this count as three (3) total under the lower lobe or count as one (1) since all are in the lower lobe?
Answer:
You can bill 36015 for each distinct selective catheterization, but only when those vessels are legitimately separate branches per the CPT Appendix L vascular-family hierarchy.
Segmental or subsegmental arteries within the same lobar distribution are not separately reportable; they are included in a single unit of 36015 for that lobe. Therefore, selective catheterization of the medial basal, posterior basal, and lateral basal segmental branches would count as one (1) selective catheterization under the right lower-lobe pulmonary artery, not three.
*This response is based on the best information available as of 12/04/25.
Do you have a Coding Question you would like answered in a future Coding Coach?
If you have an urgent coding question, don't hesitate to get in touch with us here.